A recently released survey has claimed the increased use of phones and the internet is undermining students' ability to study and is the cause of poor grammar amongst many of today's school children.
The Cranfield School of Management produced the report that blames children's use of phones and the internet for what it claims are falling standards in study, research and written communication skills.
The paper claims that 90 per cent of students did most research on the internet, which is twice the proportion who did their research by traditional books. It also found that 60 percent pupils have admitted to copying work from the internet without spending significant time reading or understanding the work, with a staggering 25% thinking blind copying is an acceptable practice. English skills have also been seen to suffer with 3 in 10 students admit using text shortcuts in essays and coursework.
Andrew Kakabadse, of Cranfield School of Management, states : "Our research shows that technology obsession hinders spelling skills, implicitly encourages plagiarism, and disrupts classroom learning." in an even handed manner.
The Report has also found that mobile phones particularly had a negative effect upon school discipline seeing pupils often ignoring rules on mobile phones at School. One third of pupils admitted to using their mobiles in class, Andrew Kakabadse also said "Despite school policies restricting mobile phone usage, students use the phone frequently, with the majority making calls from the toilets. The mobile phone continues to be a prime channel of social communication during the school day."
The study also shows patterns of behaviour that it finds worrying; many pupils spent one to two hours a day on social networking sites. Most pupils had access to a computer before the age of 8, had used the internet by the age of 10 (with some doing so as young as 5), and joined social networking sites between the ages of 11 and 13. One in 10 (9%) have admitted to spending spend more than six hours a day online.
One does wonder due to the tone of the report, if the writers expect education, learning and society at large to remain static? As technology changes education will change and adapt as it does too many other social stimuli. Many of these changes will be positive others will be negative. Circulated highlights of this report only seem to focus on the negative aspects of this technological change, and ignores the vast potential for learning and communication technology offers today's students - 30224
The Cranfield School of Management produced the report that blames children's use of phones and the internet for what it claims are falling standards in study, research and written communication skills.
The paper claims that 90 per cent of students did most research on the internet, which is twice the proportion who did their research by traditional books. It also found that 60 percent pupils have admitted to copying work from the internet without spending significant time reading or understanding the work, with a staggering 25% thinking blind copying is an acceptable practice. English skills have also been seen to suffer with 3 in 10 students admit using text shortcuts in essays and coursework.
Andrew Kakabadse, of Cranfield School of Management, states : "Our research shows that technology obsession hinders spelling skills, implicitly encourages plagiarism, and disrupts classroom learning." in an even handed manner.
The Report has also found that mobile phones particularly had a negative effect upon school discipline seeing pupils often ignoring rules on mobile phones at School. One third of pupils admitted to using their mobiles in class, Andrew Kakabadse also said "Despite school policies restricting mobile phone usage, students use the phone frequently, with the majority making calls from the toilets. The mobile phone continues to be a prime channel of social communication during the school day."
The study also shows patterns of behaviour that it finds worrying; many pupils spent one to two hours a day on social networking sites. Most pupils had access to a computer before the age of 8, had used the internet by the age of 10 (with some doing so as young as 5), and joined social networking sites between the ages of 11 and 13. One in 10 (9%) have admitted to spending spend more than six hours a day online.
One does wonder due to the tone of the report, if the writers expect education, learning and society at large to remain static? As technology changes education will change and adapt as it does too many other social stimuli. Many of these changes will be positive others will be negative. Circulated highlights of this report only seem to focus on the negative aspects of this technological change, and ignores the vast potential for learning and communication technology offers today's students - 30224
About the Author:
Cordless Phones, mobiles. DECT phones and other devices have been blamed for a fall instandards, but what we are seeing is sea change in the way people search for, deal with and store information.
